.png)
In a case that could reshape the agricultural equipment industry, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the states of Illinois and Minnesota have filed a lawsuit against Deere & Company, alleging violations of antitrust laws. The lawsuit, filed on January 15, 2025, accuses Deere of monopolistic practices that limit farmers' and independent repair providers' (IRPs) ability to repair Deere equipment, effectively forcing reliance on Deere’s authorized dealer network.
The Core Issue: Repair Restrictions
Deere is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural equipment, dominating the market for large tractors and combines in the United States. Over the years, Deere has integrated sophisticated software into its machinery, making repairs increasingly reliant on diagnostic tools and software access. However, Deere has allegedly restricted access to its fully functional repair tool, known as the "Full-Function Service ADVISOR," providing it exclusively to authorized dealers. Meanwhile, farmers and IRPs are left with a less capable version, the "Customer Service ADVISOR," which lacks essential functionalities.
The complaint outlines how these restrictions harm competition and inflate repair costs for farmers. By maintaining exclusive control over critical repair tools, Deere is accused of:
Inflating repair costs for farmers by limiting repair options to Deere dealers.
Excluding IRPs from performing essential repairs.
Forcing farmers into expensive and time-sensitive repair arrangements during critical agricultural periods like planting and harvesting.
Legal Framework
The lawsuit is brought under several statutes, including:
Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair methods of competition.
Section 2 of the Sherman Act, addressing monopolization.
The Illinois Antitrust Act and Minnesota Antitrust Law, which mirror federal antitrust principles but add state-specific enforcement mechanisms.
The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief to prohibit Deere’s restrictive practices and mandate access to repair tools on fair and nondiscriminatory terms.
Broader Implications
This lawsuit is part of the broader "right-to-repair" movement, which seeks to empower consumers and independent technicians to repair their own equipment without
manufacturer-imposed barriers. Advocates argue that such restrictions increase costs, stifle competition, and harm consumers.
For the agricultural sector, the stakes are particularly high. Farming relies on durable, functional equipment that can be repaired quickly and efficiently. Delays during planting or harvesting seasons can lead to significant financial losses. By limiting repair options, Deere allegedly undermines farmers' operational flexibility and financial stability.
Looking Ahead
The outcome of this case could set a precedent not only for agricultural equipment manufacturers but also for other industries with similar repair restrictions, such as electronics and automobiles. A decision in favor of the plaintiffs could lead to sweeping reforms, mandating broader access to repair tools and fostering competition in the repair market.
As this case unfolds, our firm will continue to monitor developments and provide updates. If you’re a business or individual affected by repair restrictions, feel free to contact us for guidance on your rights and options.
Comments